This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Aug 12 14:44:30 CEST 2015
Daniel, all - On 12.08.2015 14:16, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: > Yesterday, I've started a discussion in the member list about promoting > the use of IRC instead of Mail List for some kind of discussions, chit > chat, etc. > > Not much members answered, but all who did said yes. > > The goal is to have, at least, one channel per mail list, but not > limited to only that. > > For this list, an #address-policy channel will be created and > administrated by the WG Chairs. > > We want to use the actual RIPE IRC Server plus Network Services and some > more irc servers linked to the Ripe one. > > What do you think? I would not go so far and call this a bad idea - but I am not at all easy about it either. Random (sub) groupings of whatever kind can and should most certainly be free to use whatever means of communication they see fit - but address policy stuff must IMHO stay on this mailing list. And only there! I for sure will not open yet another ingress channel I then would need to monitor. Cheers, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]