This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Aug 11 15:03:04 CEST 2015
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, David Huberman wrote: > Strongly disagree. It relies on the NCC to do what the NCC has done > well for 25 years: be a numbers registry. Where fraud is suspected or > discovered, act in the best interests of the Internet. The NCC is well > practiced in detecting and fighting fraud, and continually improves in > this regard. Trust the NCC staff to do their jobs well; they know what > they're doing. Well, I would like to hear this from NCC itself in that case. From what I can see, RIPE NCC doesn't currently have to necessary text in the contracts and policies to enable it to do what you want it to do. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]