This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Huberman
David.Huberman at microsoft.com
Tue Aug 11 13:41:16 CEST 2015
Respectfully, I think the WG is trying to solve a problem which doesn't exist. And I STRONGLY dislike policy discussions and text which penalize 99.9% of the people just trying to operate a network because of the 0.1% of idiots who might think it's fun to do something stupid. I believe ASNs should be given out to LIRs in an on-demand basis without cost and in an automated fashion. If at some point in the future, the NCC or community discovers some child has abused the system and taken an absurd number of ASNs, the NCC has the power to revoke the ASNs under sections 6.3, 9.3, and 9.4 of the RIPE NCC Standard Service Agreement. David R Huberman Principal, Global IP Addressing Microsoft Corporation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Suggestions on a new asn assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]