[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Numbers Assignments" take #4

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Job Snijders wrote:

> ASNs have no associated cost. Sitting on 1, 1k or 10k has no impact on 
> your bill. Unless the charging scheme is updated next year to bring 
> changes in this area. The last AGM meeting made it clear to me that the 
> community does not want to associate a linear cost with ASN assignment.

The LIR with the largest amount of ASNs, how many ASNs do they have? Why 
not say it starts to cost money after 3x this current value and for RIPE 
to report back when single ASN has more than 2x current max value? If (for 
instance) current max is 100 ASNs then limiting (at least for now) to 
300ASNs per LIR might be a way to go?

I have no idea how hard it is for RIPE to handle these limits though, I 
don't want to make up a lot of rules just hapazardly that then causes 
significant CAPEX/OPEX for RIPE.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se