[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Numbers Assignments" take #4

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> 2) Ask the NCC to maintain a public out-of-policy list of valid use
> cases. Whenever a new applicant comes with potentialy valid use case
> currently not on the list, APWG could be consulted and greenlight it
> using a much more informal and fast/lightweight consensus determining
> procedure than the PDP (e.g., sending a mail to APWG describing the use
> case and asking if anyone sees any problems with it, if N weeks of
> silence, it's good). If it ends up being shot down, the applicant can
> always try his luck with the PDP instead.

I like this :-) - of course I'd like to hear what RS would have to say
about it ("we can do this" vs. "there are too many different cases to
make sense out of this", etc.) - but the general idea is nicely lightweight
and flexible...

Gert Doering
        -- no hats (this is not formal PDP anyway right now!)
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150811/982dfcae/attachment.sig>