[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Vladimir Andreev wrote:

> I already expressed my opinion about multiple LIR's in details in previous letters.
>
> "Allocate you" means "you" as contact person. You are not required to have only one organisation.
> You can open some amount of legal person and then open LIR's for each. After that request /22's for your LIR's as mentioned earlier.

I don't see a problem in one person managing multiple LIRs.
Really, i understand that managing LIRs for 3rd parties can be a service.

A big company can own dozens of other small companies and get a /22 from 
each of them -- but it shouldn't. In the case it wants to merge, it should 
return all the /22s to the NCC pool except one.

If the "well-known workaround" can't be fixed (and wrong-doings reverted) 
then the policy is useless.

ps: I've always been a strong supporter of v6 deployment, but i never 
agreed with the idea that we should run-out v4 aggressively.


Regards,
Carlos