[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hello!

Petr means opening multiple LIR's and requesting /22's for all these LIR's at once.

if you are lucky RIPE NCC will process you requests one after another and allocate you adjacent range of IP's.

28.04.2015, 09:24, "Carlos Friacas" <cfriacas at fccn.pt>:
> Hello,
>
> Noone (in the RIPE/NCC service region) is able to get more than a /22,
> according to current policies, or did i miss something?
>
> If someone is asking (and actually getting) more than a /22, those
> allocations need to be revoked -- i honestly thought current policy
> already included that...
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, Petr Umelov wrote:
>>  Hi everybody.
>>
>>  Let me tell some words about current proposal.
>>
>>  Many providers (among them is our company) need to get (e.g.) /20 subnet (not 4 x /22). If we ask the RIPE NCC to allocate 4 x /22, we can get next variants:
>>  1. /20
>>  2. 2 x /21 from different subnets
>>  3. /22, /21, /22
>>
>>  There is only one chance to get /20 100% - make request for 7 x /22 (if the tickets will be processed together). But in this case we will have unwanted 3 x /22 which we can transfer to other LIRs to minimize our expenses.
>>  And also we can get different separate 4 x /22 (the worst case) and we have to transfer such blocks and make new request.
>>
>>  If this proposal will be agreed, many providers (new and old) will have material losses. So I can't support this proposal.
>>
>>  --
>>  Kind regards,
>>  Techincal Director FastTelecom
>>  Petr Umelov

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503