This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sun Apr 26 22:54:08 CEST 2015
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015, at 23:07, Gert Doering wrote: > (Though technically, the "put a recurring price on each IP address" would > not be handled by the address policy working group and the PDP, because > that is something the RIPE general meeting (=members) needs to decide) ... And rejected a few times in different forms. Not to mention NCC's desire to avoid explicit "price per IP" for (non-)tax reasons.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]