[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

I don't attack anybody, I am just interesting
24 Апр 2015 г. 0:16 пользователь "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> написал:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:10:59PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> > So what is the benefit for Elvis, who is the broker?
> >
> > If he found 2 sides who make the transfer he will lose the part of
> clients.
> > If this proposal doesn't affect him all resellers will be brokers.
>
> If you read the minutes of the APWG meeting at the previous RIPE meeting,
> you can see that the issue was brought up by the RIPE NCC.  The group
> in the room decided that it would be good to do something about it, and
> Elvis volunteered to write up something formal to get the discussion going.
>
> It's not like Elvis made this up to further his business.
>
> (And, as a call for order: further personal attacks on the personal
> integrity of a proposer will not help bring forward your argument.  If
> you do not like a proposal, bring forth factual arguments that people
> can answer - personal attacks will just disqualify your voice when the
> chairs go about judging consensus)
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150424/5cfefdd5/attachment.html>