This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 22:10:59 CEST 2015
So what is the benefit for Elvis, who is the broker? If he found 2 sides who make the transfer he will lose the part of clients. If this proposal doesn't affect him all resellers will be brokers. 23 Апр 2015 г. 22:53 пользователь "Leo Vegoda" <leo.vegoda at icann.org> написал: > Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > [...] > > > I don't think that "a lot" of the community are IP traders (and by > > that I mean companies that make profit by buying/selling IPv4). They > > are one part of the community. > > The RIPE NCC helpfully publishes a list of brokers that have signed up to > its Recognized IPv4 Transfer Agreement: > > > https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/ipv4 > -transfers/brokers > > Regards, > > Leo Vegoda > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150423/2f23f13d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]