This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-TOM-
tom at kebab.org.pl
Thu Apr 23 19:24:21 CEST 2015
W dniu 2015-04-23 o 19:04, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze: > Surely it will stimulate to implement IPv6 networks. But the process > is very slow. And many higher providers still use IPv4 equipment. > IMO the first big stimulation point to speed-up the IPv6 roll-out was in February 2011, the "last call" was in September 2012. And after nearly 3 years there is no revolution. Still pure V6 networks without any piece of V4 are practically unusable. best regards Tomasz Śląski
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]