[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

W dniu 2015-04-23 o 17:16, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) pisze:
>
> Why Elvis, a well know IP Broker from V4Escrow, proposed this instead 
> of "Unused space should be returned to RIPE"???
>

Yessss!!! There are tons of unused /16's and even RIPE after ERX and 
LEGACY actions has currently no contact or confirmations to many of 
their holders. Thus the database is still full of garbage leaving people 
who need IPv4 to be potential fraud victim. Moreover, I think that the 
depletion of IPv4 space in RIPE region may not be real.
IMO all the legacy space, that has not been confirmed in use (for 
example no contact with legitimate holder, no route objects within it) 
in next .... 6-12(?) months should be implicitly returned to the free pool.

> Did the community think about if all the offers in the Listing Service 
> are reclaimed from RIPE, the IPv4 Exhaustion "dissapear"?
>
> Why nobody in the community proposed it?
>

Let's make the proposal.

Best regards

Tomasz Śląski