This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-TOM-
tom at kebab.org.pl
Thu Apr 23 17:55:41 CEST 2015
W dniu 2015-04-23 o 17:39, Opteamax GmbH pisze: > On 23.04.2015 17:20, -TOM- wrote: >> Over described situation is not significantly different from real user >> assignment. How to distinguish them? Send auditors? >> > So if I get you right only because it is impossible to check, it is ok > to cheat? And only because others do it, it's ok to do it? Of course I do not support such behavior, but the facts are, that the people always find a backdoor. Especially if there is money behind it... Best regards Tomasz Śląski
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]