This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Apr 23 17:04:54 CEST 2015
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015, at 16:37, Opteamax GmbH wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I don't want to soften the "last /8" policy ... as > Alex already mentioned. A business which needs IPv4 to survive does > something wrong ... Today, 23/04/2015, a business *DOES* need IPv4 to survive. IPv6 is still seen as a "geek thing", and a lot of things are still badly implemented (if implemented at all) over IPv6. The policy, the way it is, just keps the agony going on for a very long time, at least in RIPE-land.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]