[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:25:14PM +0200, Andre Keller wrote:
> Cant we just wait for the impact analysis to be published and then
> consult for (rough) consensous?

This is actually an important aspect: this discussion right now is
interesting, without any doubt, but as far as consensus building for
the proposal under discussion, it does not exist(!).

The proposal is right now neither in disussion phase (done, chairs decided
that there is enough support to go ahead) nor in review phase (starts when
the impact analysis is published and Marco formally announces the new
phase).

So, whatever you say before the review phase starts has no formal effect
on the WG chair decision on whether or not we have consensus.

(And be warned, even after review phase starts, statements of the sort
"THIS WILL RUIN MY BUSINESS!" will not be given very much weight, as we
all know the numbers - and *any* business that still relies on IPv4-only
is going to face rough waters)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150423/ffc45288/attachment.sig>