[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

OK. Let's it's welcome side effect.

Please answer me the following question:

What reasoning (not purpose) has current proposal?

23.04.2015, 15:57, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:45:56PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>>  On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses according to the following:
>>>
>>>  The size of the allocation made will be exactly one /22.
>>>
>>>  The sum of all allocations made to a single LIR by the RIPE NCC after the 14th of September 2012 is limited to a maximum of 1024 IPv4 addresses (a single /22 or the equivalent thereof).
>>>
>>>  The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation.
>>  Please point me where in quoted text you see any prohibition to open and merge LIRs with /22's?
>
> It is not prohibited, and we're not trying to achieve that - prohibiting
> is easy, enabling useful processes while discouraging abuse is the
> tricky part.
>
> The spirit of this policy should be very clear to everybody, and we're
> working on encouraging compliance with the spirit, not finding loopholes
> in the letters.
>
> In other words: we don't really care if your business model suffers if
> you can't fast-trade /22s anymore - it would be a welcome side effect.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503