[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:34:50PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015, at 14:20, Gert Doering wrote:
> > The last /8 is not there to do "business as usual, based on IPv4" - it
> > is there to enable *new* market entrants to run a few critical things
> > with IPv4, while the main deployment has to happen on IPv6.
> 
> This is sliding off-topic, but I don't see lots of new entrants
> interpreting things this way. For the moment it still is "business as
> usual based on ipv4" (with *SOME* ipv6 addition) or "no business at
> all".
> 
> Besides, with a free pool larger than 12 months ago, larger than in
> october 2012 and the second largest among RIRs (after AfriNIC), there
> still is something that could be done for the new players.

We're reserving this for new players in 5 or 10 years time.  Not for
"next month".

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150423/68dd092f/attachment.sig>