[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
> However, a question : did this ad-hoc panel have community backing, or
> was it some sort of internal WG-chairs working group? I can't remember
> to see it anywhere on any list but I would have overlooked it.

If I recall it right, the panel was set up by the WG chairs collective
to come up with a workable procedure because the collective in total
couldn't agree on anything.  

There was no mandate from the community (but members of the community 
took part in the panel, not only WG chairs), plus, the expected outcome
of the panel was a new *proposed* text, not a final decision that the 
WG chairs had to take as is.

So, yeah, it's kind of stupid to give the task to a group dedicated to
come up with something well-considered, and then decide to ignore the
result - apologies for the time wasted on that.  But it's by no means
"ignoring the mandate of the wider RIPE community".

Gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140921/15b281e7/attachment.sig>