[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure

Hi Sander & Gert, 

First I would like to say that I like the idea of rotating chairs once in a
while (even if it is going to be an extension of the term on paper ) .. And
the proposed way might be a good start to look at it.  

Voting for WP-Chairs might not be the easiest to have them included in the
current (electronic) voting system, as only members have access as far as I
know to it to vote. 

However voting in the room (show of hands / paper), might actually not
represent the community well enough. 

Having said this, I am always wondering how to and if I need to include our
voting block in favor of certain decisions that are up for voting ... voting
might be too restrictive on both options. 

As Filiz stated, discussing a persons reason at the microphone, why one
thinks he or she might not be the best candidate for a position ... might
not the be a fun thing to do.. However .. 

If you can't stand the heat .. stay out of the kitchen .. 

A discussion on one's personal flaws or having to answer his/her motivation
on stage is probably the easiest discussion you might have to do as a WG
Chair .. especially if a topic is getting a heated discussion ... 

I think that there could be a nice role for the NCC Chair on declaring
consensus about a certain candidate .. based on the discussion and overall
opinion / support shown at the microphone in the room.  

Overall, +1 for the effort on making this transparent and putting this into
the community.. 

And +1 on the proposal. 

Regards,
Erik Bais