This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 12:24:52 CEST 2014
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > * This was one of the issues the WG Chair Collective struggled with. Suppose a WG wanted to get rid of a WG Chair and he/she buses in enough "supporters" to win any vote. Is "you bussed in a lot of people" a valid argument again consensus? Or is it a sign that there's huge unrest in the community and things need to change? The point being that you can't _really_ guard against this either way if there's enough determination, and funding. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG chair re-selection procedure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]