This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-09 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in ???IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Points???)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-09 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in ???IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Points???)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] =?unknown-8bit?Q?2?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?014-09_New_Policy_Proposal_=28Language_Clarification_in_?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?=E2=3F=3FIPv6_Address_Space_Policy_For_Internet_Exchange?= =?unknown-8bit?B?IFBvaW50c+I/Pyk=?=
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gabriele Rocca
gabriele.rocca at top-ix.org
Fri Oct 24 08:34:45 CEST 2014
La terza Il 23/10/2014 23.30, Gert Doering ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> stage when an IXP has grown to the point that it attracts enough DDoS >> traffic directed at the IXP lan to cause trouble, but not before. Even >> then, this is a decision that the IXP should make: it's not the job of the >> RIPE community to tell the IXP how to manage their policy routing. > But it *is* the job of the RIPE community to tell receivers of address > space what strings are attached to it, in no uncertain terms, where the > existing text obviously wasn't clear enough. > > I maintain that the intention of the existing policy text for IXP prefixes > and root name server prefixes was all the time "you get a special exception > for that which makes you special (IXP fabric, and root name server), and > for *everything* *else*, you're just a normal participant and do what any > other Internet-connected company would do to get connectivity and space" - > strictly a MUST in RFC2119 terms, not a "we politely ask you and if you > do not want that, feel free to ignore it". > > But that was ages ago, so it's good to actually revisit this and decide > what we want the policy to be, and make it very explicitly so. > > Gert Doering > APWG chair -- Ing. Gabriele Rocca Consorzio TOP-IX Via Bogino 9 - 10123 Torino - Italy Mobile: +39 3346293329 Fax: +39 0118802619 Skype: gabrieleroc LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rocca Ai sensi del D.Lgs. 196/2003 le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i, sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceveste questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Qualsiasi utilizzo non autorizzato del contenuto di questo messaggio costituisce violazione dell'obbligo di non prendere cognizione della corrispondenza tra altri soggetti, salvo più grave illecito, ed espone il responsabile alle relative conseguenze civili e penali.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-09 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in ???IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Points???)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] =?unknown-8bit?Q?2?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?014-09_New_Policy_Proposal_=28Language_Clarification_in_?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?=E2=3F=3FIPv6_Address_Space_Policy_For_Internet_Exchange?= =?unknown-8bit?B?IFBvaW50c+I/Pyk=?=
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]