This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-09 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in ג??IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Pointsā??)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] =?unknown-8bit?Q?2?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?014-09_New_Policy_Proposal_=28Language_Clarification_in_?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?=E2=3F=3FIPv6_Address_Space_Policy_For_Internet_Exchange?= =?unknown-8bit?B?IFBvaW50c+I/Pyk=?=
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-08 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Oct 24 02:09:41 CEST 2014
Hi, > Op 23 okt. 2014, om 23:40 heeft Sascha Luck <lists-ripe at c4inet.net> het volgende geschreven: > > I agree with Nick's points and oppose this proposal as well. > Furthermore, I would propose that the IPv4 and IPv6 policies, as > regards IXPs, be changed to explicitly permit use of the assignments for mgmt purposes. Prohibiting this creates additional > work for IXPs to no apparent purpose. Ok, it seems that this language clarification proposal has uncovered some concerns about the current policy. If we want policy to be interpreted as 'the IXP prefix should be used for the peering LAN, but using it for IXP management purposes is also fine' then we need a policy change because as I read it the current text is explicitly saying the opposite. Any volunteers for writing a policy proposal? :) Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] =?unknown-8bit?Q?2?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?014-09_New_Policy_Proposal_=28Language_Clarification_in_?= =?unknown-8bit?Q?=E2=3F=3FIPv6_Address_Space_Policy_For_Internet_Exchange?= =?unknown-8bit?B?IFBvaW50c+I/Pyk=?=
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-08 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]