[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
<d.baeza at tvt-datos.es> wrote:

> Easy. The current IPv6 deploy makes me cry like a little girl.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjJQBjWYDTs


> NOBODY (as
> percentage) is deploying it in their customer/backone/whatever network.

This is not true.


> If we want to migrate from v4 to v6, some drastic changes should be made.

Like only handing out /22 any more?


> One of them, requiring the v6 to be publicly visible if you want to have the
> last /22.

This is not something that will drive v6 adoption. It's laughably easy
to get around this requirement.


For Gert's benefit: I am fine with removing and/or softening this requirement.


Richard