[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote:
> > Hi Gert,
> >
> > Any windows dressing in the policy should be avoided .. If people want
> to implement v6, they will .. If people need to request v6 in order to
> obtain v6, they will.. But it doesn't mean they will deploy ...
> >
> > Based on that, I would say, strike the v6 requirement in order to
> request the last v4 /22 ..
> > Added to that, having people that deployed v6 based on PI having to turn
> in their space as it doesn't fit the requirement feels like a slap in the
> face and a waste of effort ... I would vote to have that fixed ...
>
> agree, let's just drop the v6 and give out the last /22 to those that want
> it.
>
>
I could probably write a couple of thousands of words about this, but I'll
be brief:

Yes, please let's just drop the v6 requirement.

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141011/c9ca3422/attachment.html>