[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

>>> Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote:
>>>> Easy. The current IPv6 deploy makes me cry like a little girl. NOBODY
>>>> (as percentage) is deploying it in their customer/backone/whatever
>>>> network.
>>> ... even if stated again and again, it simply is not true. Please stop
>>> these claims, they may be even more detrimental to IPv6 deployment, if
>>> read by some people not having "real data" and/or first-hand
>>> experience.
>> perhaps a pointer to these real data would make your point
> Take a look at
> e.g. http://www.vix.at/vix_participants.html?&no_cache=1&L=1, the
> column "IPv6 Routeserver activated".
> 
> I presume it wouldn't be useful to have that configured, unless there
> is deployment in these ASNs.

with all due respect, wilfred.  iij has had a backbone configiured for
ipv6 since 1997.  but that is anecdote not data.

randy