[address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]

hello,

a rather late reply

On 11/12/2014 11:26 AM, Wilhelm Boeddinghaus wrote:
> Am 12.11.2014 um 08:32 schrieb Aleksi Suhonen:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 11/09/2014 06:06 PM, Lu wrote:
>>> Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need
>>> two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal
>>> IP address is the day we really in a world of v6.
>>
>> In theory, the IPv6 working group and mailing lists are not only about
>> address policy. In practice, I do think that a separate mailing list
>> for IPv6 at RIPE has outlived its usefulness. In essence, I support
>> this proposal.

sorry, but this just doesn't make sense. RIPE's IPv6 WG is about 
promoting IPv6 adoption and there's definitely a long way to go...
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/wg/ipv6


> Hi,
>
> But
> please let the forum for technical discussion about IPv6 untouched. We
> will need that for the next 10 years until we all have as much
> experience with IPv6 as we have with IPv4 today.

+1

regards,
Yannis

> Regards,
>
> Wilhelm