This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shahab Vahabzadeh
sh.vahabzadeh at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 11:08:27 CET 2014
Hi there, Yes I know, But they only peer with the ASN which you bought service from. You mean ISPs must buy two kind of service from provider (this upstream) to be multi-home or convince the peer with both of ASNs? Thanks On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Reza Mahmoudi <R.mahmoudi at mobinnet.net> wrote: > Hi > > > > To add a comment, the upstream you mentioned here, has at least 2 > different ASN's. In addition, Multihome doesn't necessarily mean peering > with the sole upstream but you can peer with others... > > > > Cheers, > > Reza > > > > *From:* address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto: > address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] *On Behalf Of *Shahab Vahabzadeh > *Sent:* Saturday, November 22, 2014 1:22 PM > *To:* Saeed Khademi > *Cc:* address-policy-wg at ripe.net > *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] Just FYI > > > > Dear Saeed, > > Thanks for this, But is there any to control this? In country like Iran in > which you can only peer with your upstream. > > What they can do? > > Thanks > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Saeed Khademi <saeed at ipm.ir> wrote: > > Dear members, > > > > During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to > our instructor ) there are some organizations > > having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. > > > > According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in > AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) > > which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request > will not be processed by hostmaster. > > and here: > > > http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignments/request-an-as-number > > it is clearly mentioned that "Current guidelines require a network to be > multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned" > > > > Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with > ASN, isn't it a wrong doing? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Saeed. > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator > > Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 > PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163 > > > > -- > > This email was Virus checked by Juniper Security Gateway. > > -- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 1C43 988E 01A8 4D95 B662 9118 CD94 9F10 4DF4 6163 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141122/c3e680eb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]