This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Just FYI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Saeed Khademi
saeed at ipm.ir
Sat Nov 22 10:19:22 CET 2014
Dear members, During previous RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, I noticed that ( according to our instructor ) there are some organizations having AS number while they do not have a multihome network. According policy it is a mandatory requirement for having an ASN. Even in AS request form there is a mandatory field ( peers ) which requestor has to declare at least 2 peers, otherwise the request will not be processed by hostmaster. and here: http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/allocations-and-assignments/request-an-as-number it is clearly mentioned that “Current guidelines require a network to be multi-homed, and have a unique routing policy for an ASN to be assigned” Now if it is really true that there are single-home organizations with ASN, isn’t it a wrong doing? Kind Regards, Saeed. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141122/9dff0439/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just FYI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]