This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Nov 18 12:32:02 CET 2014
Hello Wilfried, > In general, I would be much more in favour of a version of the proposal which removes > the IPV6 holdership or usage *completely*. For all the reasons that have been pointed > out already by others. (Thanks for that!). I fully agree. I will work with the authors and help them to update the proposal text. Cheers, Sander PS: yes, this means that I am involved in this policy proposal and I will abstain on all WG-chair related duties about this proposal as I have now clearly given up my neutrality on this :) Gert has agreed to decide on this proposal without my input.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]