[address-policy-wg] pointless meta-issue on WG renaming

Wilhelm, I don't believe you have read what I was writing, I was simply suggest a name change to fairly treat v6 as v4, not a new structure of all working group, please do not extend my wording for me, thanks.

 And the chair is right, this discussion should not happen here in this mailing list as it has nothing to do with address policy. So I will move off the topic here, this is my last reply on this topic in this mailing list.



> On 2014年11月12日, at 上午11:50, Wilhelm Boeddinghaus <wilhelm at boeddinghaus.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am 12.11.2014 um 12:39 schrieb Lu:
>> "We" is a too board definition. Me as part of Ripe community are not agree with that "we" for example. Please provide valuable argument if you think my suggestion is " pointless".
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On 2014年11月12日, at 上午11:29, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 12 Nov 2014, at 11:20, Lu <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Should we re-name v6 group to address-technical in which different from address-policy?
>>> No.
>>> 
>>>> So one day we don't need a v7 group, and people with technical issue with v4 can discuss there as well.
>>> RIPE can create a WG for IPv7 or whatever if and when the need arises. It can also kill a WG in the same way. [Provided Bijal is in the room. :-)] That's how we do things at RIPE.
> Hi Lu,
> 
> I think that names are not that important, content is more important. Would you please send a proposal to the lists (IPv6, Address Policy, routing, anti abuse and connect). Please include your ideas for new names, new charters and the new structure of the working groups. Do not forget the routing WG, the connect WG  and the anti abuse WG, because they also deal with IPv4 and IPv6 (routing, peering, IP based blacklists, etc.).
> 
> Would you like to present the new structure of WGs in Amsterdam next May in the plenary? This would then start the official bottom up process. And then "we", this includes you, can discuss this based on your ideas and proposals.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wilhelm
>