This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksi Suhonen
ripe-ml-2012 at ssd.axu.tm
Wed Nov 12 08:32:02 CET 2014
Hello, On 11/09/2014 06:06 PM, Lu wrote: > Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need > two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal > IP address is the day we really in a world of v6. In theory, the IPv6 working group and mailing lists are not only about address policy. In practice, I do think that a separate mailing list for IPv6 at RIPE has outlived its usefulness. In essence, I support this proposal. -- +358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/ Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Merging ipv6 and address policy mailing lists]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]