This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Nov 10 11:42:39 CET 2014
* Sascha Luck [ml] > I don't see why LIRs must be accountable to the mob rather > than the NCC whom I they have a contract with. I can see this > leading to endless harassment by people who haven't read or > understood the policies, want to damage competitors or are simply > trolls. > What safeguards, if any, do you propose to prevent this? None. I think that having the LIRs be accountable to the community in a transparent fashion is much a better alternative than shrouding everything in secrecy. There might be uninformed people or trolls crying foul based on public information, but with everything out in the open, the more informed amongst us is in a much better position to point out that there is no foul (assuming there is none). As an aside, I was puzzled to hear Andrea (iirc) say at the mic that the identity of the Russian organisation that held 100 ASNs was confidential. That information should be right there out in the open in the RIPE database, should it not? How could it possibly be confidential? Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]