This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian Feurdean
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Nov 10 09:43:36 CET 2014
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014, at 17:00, Erik Bais wrote: > There is a policy proposal currently in discussion phase to Allow IPv6 > Transfers. > > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 November 2014. Hello, In order to get to the end of the logic (and also be a bit more in-line with the rationale of 2014-04), Shouldn't we also review the paragraph 7.1 ("IPv6 PI Assignments for LIRs") ? Or should this be done in a separate proposal ?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ipv6-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]