[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10

Should we put address policy wh together with IPv6 wg? Why we need two different wg for addressing?the day we start treat IPv6 as normal IP address is the day we really in a world of v6.

This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.

> On 2014年11月9日, at 上午11:00, address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net wrote:
> 
> Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to
>    address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy    Proposal (Allow IPv6
>      Transfers) (Erik Bais)
>   2. Re: 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
>      (Andy Davidson)
>   3. Re: 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS Number Transfers)
>      (Andy Davidson)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 17:00:35 +0100
> From: "Erik Bais" <ebais at a2b-internet.com>
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] FW: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy
>    Proposal (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
> To: <ipv6-wg at ripe.net>
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="Windows-1252"
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> This email is to inform the people who are subscribed on the IPv6 WG list
> but not on the Address Policy WG list.  
> 
> There is a policy proposal currently in discussion phase to Allow IPv6
> Transfers.  
> 
>> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12
> 
>> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
> 
> Regards,
> Erik Bais
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: policy-announce-bounces at ripe.net
> [mailto:policy-announce-bounces at ripe.net] Namens Marco Schmidt
> Verzonden: donderdag 30 oktober 2014 13:43
> Aan: policy-announce at ripe.net
> CC: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Onderwerp: [policy-announce] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow IPv6
> Transfers)
> 
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> 
> A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-589, "IPv6 Address Allocation 
> and Assignment Policy" is now available for discussion.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12
> 
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 09:58:40 +0000
> From: Andy Davidson <andy at nosignal.org>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 New Policy Proposal (Allow
>    IPv6 Transfers)
> To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID: <20141109095830.GA31177 at chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:43:29PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12
>> [... Allow IPv6 Transfer ...]
>> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
>> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
> 
> Support.
> 
> -a
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 10:05:49 +0000
> From: Andy Davidson <andy at nosignal.org>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-13 New Policy Proposal (Allow AS
>    Number Transfers)
> To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID: <20141109100549.GB31177 at chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-13
>> [... Allow AS Number Transfers ...]
>> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
>> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 November 2014.
> 
> Support the end result but don't support text as it stands.
> 
> - Would prefer not to see it possible to transfer ASN on a temporary
>   basis - if an organisation needs temporary resources these are
>   available from the RIPE NCC.
> 
> - Not sure if a list of non-approved ASN transfers is useful, and
>   concerned that it might put people off registering transfers with
>   the NCC.
> 
> -a
> 
> 
> 
> 
> End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
> *************************************************