This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 new radical suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 new radical suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Wed May 7 16:01:02 CEST 2014
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > > If you go down this road, exactly which address blocks an organisation > gets from ARIN will prohibit them from getting a /22 from RIPE NCC? And if > you look at organisational structure it becomes even more complicated: what > if a big corporation has subsidiaries in both the US and EU, and the US > company gets address space from ARIN. Does that disqualify the EU > company/LIR from getting address space? > > Remember: someone has to be able to implement the policies we create here! > :) > I was about to post something very similar to this, but then you stole the show. ;) Very well put, I agree completely, although I think it's a bit of a mess that we have regional separation of IP registries in the first place, this isn't something that's fixed or mitigated by making policies dependent on what I consider unpredictable remote social dynamics. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140507/7b91faaf/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 new radical suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]