[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Policy Proposal (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote:
> If that PI assignment is already in use, a requirement to renumber and
> return it might be a showstopper for getting PA space. Renumbering is
> *hard* - it is *a lot* of work.

As the guy who renumbered a /17 in a few months: Yes. Oh my $deity... yes.


> So while I don't think 2014-04 is harmful in any way and I don't have
> any objections to it, I do find it quite puzzling that it does not try
> to fix the actual problem in ripe-589 section 7.1 - which, if 2014-04
> were to pass, would remain just as «downright deleterious to IPv6
> adoption» as before.

I would also support such a proposal or maybe even help spearhead it. ...Tore?


Richard