[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 New Policy Proposal (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)

Dear Sacha,

> What I'm trying to tell you here is that abolition of any min-alloc size
> will again require demonstration of "need" in order to get a useful (ie.
> routeable) allocation (with all that this entails). Another good question is whether under final-/8 rules, if you can only
> justify, say a /29, this will be the last request considered?

I think there is a misunderstanding here.

This policy (2014-01) does not change the rest of the text of 5.1.

It still says:

1. The size of the allocation made will be exactly one /22.

Best regards,
Janos

> rgds,
> Sascha Luck
>
>