This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Mar 25 18:35:27 CET 2014
Hi Gert,
On 25/03/14 15:26, Gert Doering wrote:
[...]
> There might be other reasons as well.. It's just a feeling that limiting
> at /24 is the right thing to do. On the other hand, while writing this
> e-mail I've been having second thoughts on each of the paragraphs and
> reasons :-)
> It's good to have the arguments out, so we can think through them - thanks!
I tried to play the devil's advocate role this time. As said, even when
writing all my con's I realized these aren't too strong.
As you already know, I'm in favor of not adding any limitations in
policy. I was just trying to voice all the possible con's.
>
> Gert Doering
> -- no hats
cheers,
elvis
-- blue hat to protect against the sun :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]