This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] A question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Tue Mar 25 15:40:20 CET 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:44:21PM +0100, Erik Bais wrote: Dear Erik > In the current draft, I’ve phrased one of the ‘rules’ for the PI transfer as > follows: > > > - Assignments smaller than the minimal allocation size, can’t be > split into smaller assignments, but can be re-assigned as a complete > assignment. [cut] > The question that I have is, would the community prefer a transfer policy > proposal for PI with or without the above stated rule or limitation in > freedom in transfers of PI. I would prefer not to have this put into policy text. I don't think we have any effective tools to enforce it. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input request for the PI Transfer policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] A question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]