This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PA/PI - restarting discussion after failed 2013-06 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Mar 20 16:50:19 CET 2014
All, On 19.03.2014 19:20, Gert Doering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:17:57PM +0000, Erik Bais wrote: >> I was under the impression that there was enough support for the >> LIR Infrastructure PI to PA change that there wasn?t additional >> policy needed after the discussion in Athens. > > Right. What I understood was that the NCC is having second > thoughts here regarding minimum allocation size, and is waiting for > the policy proposal to get rid of the formal minimum allocation > size before going forward with the PI-to-PA-change. So for the > change itself, no extra policy is needed. the proposal has been handed to the NCC earlier this week and is currently in the making of getting ready for publication. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PA/PI - restarting discussion after failed 2013-06 proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]