This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-01 Last Call for Comments (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Going to last call: 2014-01 (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] why-pi question still in request form after 2011-02 acceptance?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Schmidt
mschmidt at ripe.net
Mon Jun 16 14:43:33 CEST 2014
Dear colleagues,
The proposal described in 2014-01, "Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size
for IPv4", is now in its Concluding Phase.
The Address Policy Working Group co-Chairs have declared that consensus for
the proposal has been reached and it will now move to Last Call.
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of these
coming four weeks of Last Call is to give the community the opportunity
to present well-justified objections in case anyone missed the previous
two phases and want to oppose the proposal.
Any objection must be made by 15 July 2014 and must be supported by an
explanation.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-01
Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg at ripe.net
before 15 July 2014.
Regards
Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Going to last call: 2014-01 (Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] why-pi question still in request form after 2011-02 acceptance?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]