This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sat Jun 7 11:33:26 CEST 2014
Just as a heads-up: On 06.06.2014 00:58, Scott Leibrand wrote: > [...] Also: > > -Address space may only be re-allocated to another LIR that is a member > of an RIR that allows transfers. The block that is to be re-allocated > must not be smaller than the minimum allocation block size at the time > of re-allocation. > +Address space may only be re-allocated to another organization that is > a member of an RIR that allows transfers. The block that is to be > re-allocated must not be smaller than the minimum allocation block size > at the time of re-allocation. Given the support that 2014-01 has seen so far, you may want to think this paragraph without its second sentence; cf. items e) & f) of https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-01 - and see whether it still makes sense to you. Cheers, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]