[address-policy-wg] 2014-05 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources)

> On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:44 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> However, that may have implications for intra-RIR transfers, so you might
>> need to separate out the two cases if you don't want to imply that non-LIR
>> organizations can receive transfers in the RIPE region.  Maybe something
>> like "to another LIR in the RIPE region, or an organization that is a
>> member of an RIR that allows transfers."
> 
> All RIPE members are LIRs.

Oh, good point. We actually end up with the same problem with the word "member" that occurs with the word "LIR". End user organizations in other regions can receive address space via transfer without being members. This text would exclude them from inter-RIR transfers from the RIPE region. 

Maybe "to another LIR in the RIPE region, or an organization in the service region of another RIR that allows transfers"?


-Scott