[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27

hi

My 2 cents.

If there is person or company need ip and network in the region, so ripe Ncc will provide. Simple.

I trust ripe Ncc is smart enough to avoid any political bs.



This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.

> On 2014年7月29日, at 下午6:00, address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net wrote:
> 
> Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to
>    address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers (Jo?o Damas)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:54:22 +0200
> From: Jo?o Damas <joao at bondis.org>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
> To: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>
> Cc: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>, address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <7C28157D-633E-45BC-8855-4B3864CC436A at bondis.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> 
>> On 29 Jul 2014, at 11:35, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 29 Jul 2014, at 10:21, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please take your fight and accusations elsewhere.  It does not have anything
>>> to do with the address policy working group.
>> 
>> +1000000
>> 
>> RIPE and the NCC should keep well out of these political matters.
> 
> Away from the political aspects: indeed! This is not the place where these things can be solved.
> 
> Away from the legal aspects, quite possibly not. There is a requirement to provide legal papers and it would be good for the RIPE NCC to seek advice on the matter without making judgement calls. I don?t think anyone wants a repeat of previous sub-optimal handling of legal and law enforcement requests by the RIPE NCC. It?s better to be on solid ground and it shouldn?t be hard to ask for legal review.
> 
> Joao
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 203 bytes
> Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
> Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140729/0fddb49d/attachment-0001.bin 
> 
> End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 35, Issue 27
> *************************************************