This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 8 12:15:04 CEST 2014
Hi Niall, Op 8 jul. 2014, om 11:18 heeft Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> het volgende geschreven: > At Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:11:10 +0200, > Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >> >> And as you said, there should be a "cut-off" for reserve. > > What I understand is that we have reached the cut-off point > and are using the reserve up, one /22 at a time, according to > consensus-based policy. > > I'll be happy to be corrected in case I'm mistaken. You are not mistaken. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]