This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 17:10:16 CEST 2014
(As there is now a concrete proposal, I am replying again) On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) <d.baeza at tvt-datos.es> wrote: > Is that the only problem? Was hoping more... :) IMO those are huge issues. > How was it done before? How ppl used to prove they needed more space? There was less incentive to cheat in the past. Now, there's all sorts of desperation and the issue will only become worse over time. I fear this approach will either create huge administrative burdens or be easy to exploit... Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]