This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Jul 3 15:38:57 CEST 2014
Daniel - On 02.07.2014 19:53, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote: > [...] > > As I understood, he said no, he said _nobody_ wants it when at this > time, only 6 ppl replied the thread. He expect not to come this proposal > so is knocking it down before I made it. if only you would start writing it up eventually - as I have recommended already on 30 Apr - in the light of what Jim and Sander have written here: what exactly, reasoning, outlook, pros & cons. Instead of trying to find allies for a yet completely rough sketch of what you have in mind. And for the records: count me in as #7 if you wish - I remain fully unconvinced for the time being. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]