[address-policy-wg] Use of the Reserved IP Pool

W dniu 2014-07-03 09:14, Gert Doering pisze:
> If the NCC approved the transfer, and months later takes the addresses 
> away without any fault on the side of the receiving party, I'd bring 
> that up before the board or before the RIPE arbiters. This is not what 
> should happen (but without more background information, nobody on this 
> mailing list will be able to say more). 

The problem is, that this fraud cases is under investigation by the 
polish authorities and we signed one-copy NDA with them. As we explained 
to NCC many times, we cant disclose documents covered by NDA, 
additionaly regardless of confidentiality agreement signed when 
submitting evidence of fraud, the lawyers have warned, that the Polish 
criminal law in Article 241 § 1 of the Criminal Code states: "Whoever 
without authority distributes news and facts from investigation before 
they were disclosed in court proceedings, subject to the penalty of 
fine, or restriction of liberty, or imprisonment for 2 years".

> This statement is fully correct. The /22 allocation is not automatic, 
> you have to send in a request, and meet the criteria - which are not 
> very many these days ("must have an IPv6 allocation", and even that is 
> being softened to avoid a few corner cases). Depending on the time 
> this was sent, you might have failed to demonstrate need (which was 
> abandoned earlier this year, but that's a fairly recent change), or 
> not have requested an IPv6 allocation yet.

All criteria are met. First of all we have an ASN and Ipv6 alloc. We 
need the v4 IP's because we are an small ISP and the bought IP's we 
lost. The NCC was not able and did not present any legal or contractual 
reasons to refuse v4 allocation to its member in this situation. Only 
reason was, that this is because of so-called fraud with v4 transfers. I 
can not agree with this, because RIPE NCC made this transfers, and after 
long time reverted it. I did possible to me checks of the seller, 
inclusive paid reports in relevant registers.  And at this time I'm not 
sure, who really cheated me.

> Again: bring it up to the arbiters. That's what they are there for - 
> neutral oversight. Gert Doering -- NetMaster 

Let's try. But I'm afraid that will be next loss of money.

Regards

Tomasz Slaski