This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jan 6 20:52:12 CET 2014
> Hi John. > > I've recently been asked some questions about IPv6 allocations. So I > went back and reviewed the current ARIN NRPM. > > John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> writes: > > > Since we do have a service region, we require requesters to be operating in > > the ARINregion and to announce the least-specific in the region, but nothing > > precludes announcement of same or more specifics from outside the region. > > <https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_31/PDF/monday/nobile_policy.pdf> > > FWIW, I couldn't find any mention of announcements in the NRPM, other > than in the context of multihoming. So, where exactly does the above > requirement about announcements come from? > > Also, if one is required to announce the full prefix within ARIN, > doesn't that imply one can't get an allocation for private use where > there is no intention to announce publically? > > Finally, there does not seem to be much clarity in the term "operating > in the ARIN region". Consider a global entity that effectively > operates in multiple, if not all regions. Let's assume their primary > or legal home is within the ARIN region. Is that enough? Apparently > not entirely. I've been told that when providing justification for > obtaining IPv6 address space, ARIN only counts usage within the ARIN > region. That implies multi-nationals are expected to go to multiple > RIRs, and get fragmented address space, something I thought RIR > addressing policies were supposed to discourage. > > Do I understand ARIN policies correctly? > > And do other RIRs do the same? I.e., do the collective RIR policies > really say multi-nationals need to go to each RIR to get the address > space they need, rather than going to one, and getting a single > aggregate? > > Thomas thomas, you must be misunderstanding something. for many years, arin has said that they have nothing to do with routing. randy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 527 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140106/78429687/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Announcing address resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]