This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Feb 25 19:55:58 CET 2014
Hi, On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:03:40PM +0100, Athina Fragkouli wrote: > These options are outlined in the RIPE NCC procedural document ???Due > Diligence for the Quality of the RIPE NCC Registration Data???, which is > available at: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-556 > > We believe these options cover situations where the natural persons do > not want to provide their identification card or passport. Well. Since this is procedures and not policy, we have no formal authority over this - OTOH, I think I'm not alone when I have the feeling that this exceeds the requirements of the policy by far. I can see the wish for such a strong requirements for end users that become direct access users (DAU) with the RIPE NCC, but that category was discontinued anyway. For normal end users, the policy requires "a contract with a sponsoring LIR", and I think it should be fully sufficient to leave questions of identity validation for natural persons to the LIR in question. Like "I know this person personally, I'm fine with doing business with him", that should be good enough for the NCC as well - after all, the whole idea of the "sponsoring LIR" construct is that the NCC has a trusted intermediate, and the end user does not have to deal with the NCC. Of course I can't decide anything what the NCC will do or not do, but what I *can* do is put this on the next meeting's APWG agenda, to discuss what requirements for ID validation the community mandates. The NCC should not gratiously exceed the bureaucracy demanded from it. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140225/d35c2121/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Post Ident / Post Brief
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]